CalJunket

Wednesday, September 29, 2004

It's not the war. It's the humidity.

The great thing about Iraq and the reverse domino theory that justifies it (this week) is that it proved conservatives really understand the lessons of Vietnam: military interventionist distractions are difficult in humid weather. Find someplace dry. That is all.


(0) comments

Tuesday, September 28, 2004

Free speech is cool and all, but...

Today I was advised by an ASUC colleague to not say anything more about the multicultural center because it might be problematic to the people involved with the project if semi-unpublic information was made public. While I appreciate this person's dedication to sensitivity, this conversation was another indication to me that the members of the ASUC take themselves way too damn seriously, and in gerneral oppose being criticized in any way.

For example, as the coordinator of asuc.org, one of my ideas was to develop an ASUC blog in which a variety of interested and talented non-ASUC students would discuss ASUC events and policies and offer their own critiques of our student government. In my proposition to the senate members, I explained that the writers would not be allowed to make personal attacks and would be encouraged to address policy, not parties or people. Unfortunately, though, more than a few senators didn't like the idea of a blog because, to paraphrase, they didn't like the idea of people saying negative things about the ASUC government without the senators being consulted first.

What the balls?

As another example of this weird attitude toward crticism, the senior staff of the Office of the President were discouraged from talking to people in the Daily Cal (or anyone who might know someone in the DC) about happenings in the ASUC lest our discussion be construed as something negative about the president.

Huh?

I obviously see the need for elected figures to have their personal lives independed of the ASUC, and I can kinda get behind the idea that some senatorial and executive conversations should be kept temporarily private, but the general fear of critique, especially from senators, is confounding to me.

Never fear, though. After the dust settles on this semester, maybe a little after the 8th week, I'll spring the blog idea again. I encourage my readers to offer their opinions on the idea because, after all, I'm adult enough to handle criticism.



(0) comments

Thursday, September 23, 2004

Sigh.

Word on the street has it that in the negotiations about the proposed Multicultural Center, some people are suggesting that the center should only be available to groups relating to underrepresented minorities on campus. Not even Chinese or Korean or general Asian groups would be part of this underrepresented distinction. There are so many things wrong with this idea.

First, some background. About five years ago many of the etnic studies departments on campus went on strike, and in the negotiations, one of the concessions on behalf of the university was that one day the campus would have a Multicultural Center. The current proposition has the MC Center replacing Heller Lounge, on ASUC property.

I admittedly don't know many of the details about the proposed center, but the idea of limiting access is very wrong (and dare I say offensive, if that's your game) for at least two big reasons. First, restricting the center to only underrepresented minorities (everybody but east Asian and non-ethnic student groups, I guess?) implies that the path to equality is paved with exclusion. Second, this proposition implies that non-ethnically underrepresented student groups are not capable of appreciating or supporting multiculturalism.

Then of course there are plain old logistial problems with the logic of exclusion. Very saliently, what constitutes "underrepresented"? Is this based on campus representation versus state population? In that case, white people are underrepresented (30% of campus versus about 47% of California population.) Or is this based on a visceral reaction against whites and east Asians?

I'd like to learn more about this proposition and the people behind it. More as I find it out.



(0) comments

Sunday, September 19, 2004

Why I love Moby Dick

No, there’s nothing witty about my subject line: I really do like Moby Dick. As it’s one of the only three books I brought with me two Italy (the others being a dry book on computer algorythms and the immenently unrereadable “The Left Hand of Darkness”) I’ve had a lot of time to read it and I have done so, twice this trip. I don’t really know how to explain my love of what is often thought of as a dense symbolist tome but let me try.

First, the story is interesting. It isn’t a love story or a faher son story or any of the other stock storys that I’ve heard ten million times before. It’s a story about a guy who goes out to kill a big fat white sperm whale becuase it bit off his leg. Try finding that in Shakespear or Greek myths.

And if I may point out, a white whale is a great metaphor for just about anything. Evil, fear of the unknown, nature, whatever. Go ahead and pick something: Death, God, Revenge. Therer’s gallons of metaphor held in deep pockets in the sperm whale’s hump. Next to all that sperm oil I mean.

Being metephorical wouldn’t do the book any good if you coulodn’t understand it. Fortuently, for all his volumous laguange, Mellville throws big red flares in front of his symbols to let the dimwitted know what’s going on. Ussually it’s something like “For was not Queequa really a nobel savage?” If you’re perpetually unobservant like me, you’ll appreciate the hand-rails and clearly marked exit signs.

Lastly, the book is informative. Although I’m sure the modern scientific knowledge of whales far outstrips eerything Mellville knew (we now know that the Blue Whale does indeed exists) it’s interesting to learn about whaling and sailing at the time. That is all.


(0) comments

Saturday, September 18, 2004

Squelch Bar Mitzvah tomorrow!
8:00pm at Blake's on Telegraph!
Cheap drinks!

Sorry. Not today. Tomorrow. Sunday. Whoopsies.

Thanks to Cooper for the tip. Who needs and intern when I have you.



(0) comments

Wednesday, September 15, 2004

Remember when The Simpsons was poignant and clever instead of just absurd and loud?

After graduation this May I will most likely begin the steps necessary to becoming a teacher. I am looking to earn my single-subject credential (math or literature - I'm not sure yet) concurrently with a Master's Degree. Part of my interest in teaching originates from my appreciation of people in the profession (most notably my mother and uncle) who genuinely care about students' well being. I would like to teach in what the industry calls an"underperforming" (read "poor") school; I feel that's where my roots and emotions lay. Having attended this type of school through seventh grade, and having had so many teachers who were actively invested in their students' lives, and conversely having endured so many teachers who didn't give a flying fuck, I've come to believe that I'm capable of being the former kind of teacher. This may just be a manifestation of "liberal guilt" (bah!) coupled with unmitigated conceit, but I'm certain I'd be a damn good teacher to "underperforming" students. My mother, who teaches kindergarten to the poorest of the poor in Long Beach, has repeatedly been told by her peers that she should teach middle-class students instead because she'd make more money and wouldn't have to deal with as much strife (such as having people on crack coming to pick up their kids). Instead, she feels that her experience and talent is more useful where she is.

Anyhow, this is just a very lengthy and unfunny way of introducing one of my favorite quotes from one of my top five favorite episodes of The Simpsons. (I am Rebecca C. Brown.)

"That's the problem with being middle class. Anybody who really cares will abandon you for those who need it more."



(0) comments

Tuesday, September 14, 2004

Why didn't anyone warn me about Mass Comm?

I'm an Interdisciplinary Studies Field major (ISF) here at Cal, which means I get to more or less make up my own course of study within some perameters. In my field of concentration, I have chosen to analyze mass media, consumerism, visual representation, and the like in what has proven to be a more intellectually stimulating series of classes than I had expected. I have taken courses in American Studies, Visual Studies, ISF, History of Art, Women's Studies, and now Mass Communications. In addition to learning volumes about consumer culture, advertising, and visual communication, this academic path has taught me another very important lesson:

The Mass Communications department is for lazy students incapable of conducting critical and/or sub-superficial analyses of social issues!

There, I said it. I swear to Baby Jesus, my Mass Comm discussion section is populated by consumer culture apologists who can't comprehend existence outside their own little personal spheres of affluence and complacency. One woman in my class went so far as to claim that, Hey, we're products of overkill 1980s Regean-era regulation-free advertising aimed specifically at unsuspecting children, and we turned out fine.

NO! No we didn't! We're not fine! We all buy way more stuff than we need, we all inject identity into ourselves via commodities, we all thoughtlessly produces tons of garbage each year and waste water and waste paper and waste plastic, and only see a product for its consumptive value and not the productive process that preceeded our purchase of the product! Aggghh!

I was under the erroneous notioimpression that Mass Comm is for people who are interested in critiquing mass communications; it turns out that it's full of Haas rejects who think this is their second chance at a career in advertising and television. So sad.

In short, ISF rocks. People who go into ISF are there because they want to think for themselves. We're the rebels. We dance to our own beat. And we were most likely unpopular in high school.



(0) comments

Monday, September 13, 2004

Squelch DE-Cal!

Are you in L&S and currently enrolled in only three four-unit classes? Do you like jokes? Are you potty trained? Then get into the Squelch DE-Cal.

First class tonight. 204 Wheeler. 5:30pm-7:00pm or whenever Matt and Mark get tired of your ugly mugs. Get CCN tonight. Class filles up quickly. The instructors are also very handsome. One is even single.



(0) comments

Sunday, September 12, 2004

Well Sarah Silverman thinks it's funny.

Word on the street has it that comedic temptress Sarah Silverman thinks that "A University Guide to Speech Codes" (the nastly little Squelch article accused of disseminating racist discourse) is hilarious. A couple of my Squelchers went to see her at the Punchline on Firday, where both Sarah and Chris Hardwick (yes, of "Singled Out" fame) were performing. Both enjoyed our magazine. Sarah especially enjoyed "Speech Codes." Then again, she isn't renowned for being racially sensitive in public.



(0) comments

Thursday, September 09, 2004

Squelch Bar Mitzvah! Brews and Jews!

Yes, it's that big.

The Squelch has turned 13, and it's time to become a man.

Sunday, September 19th at Blake's on Telegraph. $5 at the door with Cal ID. $3 well drinks, and $3 microbrews. DJ, stand-up, some open mic. Starts at 8:00pm.

Be there or be a gentile with no sense of fun.



(0) comments

Monday, September 06, 2004

Yvette Fellarca drops bill...for some reason.

For whatever reason, Senator Fellarca has decided to withdraw the Squelch condemnation bill, at least for the time being. This disappoints me very much; I was looking forward to the debate. With any luck it will reemerge next week.



(0) comments

DAAP bullying crosses the line.

While Senator Yvette Fellarca's SB18 bill (the one that would have the ASUC officially condemn the Heuristic Squelch and demand an apology from us to a select few ethnic groups on campus) is in and of itself a bullying tactic, her recent attempt at "negotiations" with Senator Ben Narodick have proven too underhanded for me to support on any grounds. In short, Fellarca promised to withdraw SB18 if Narodick promised to sponsor two of her bills, one pertaining to the removal of regent Ward Connerly, the other in support of affirmative action. While tactics like these are perhaps commonplace in grown-up people government, and while Yvette most likely feels she is simply "politicing," this attempt at coercion is distasteful to me.

It indicates to me that SB18 wasn't penned in an attempt to ameliorate campus racism, but was instead written as leverage. That Fellarca was all too willing to withdraw a bill about which she had previously seemed so vehement in exchange for Ben's cooperation shows that she is not interesting in altering students' views of racism on prejudice on campus; instead, she would like to strong-arm students into seeing through her lenses. She doesn't care that Ben might not support her two other bills, nor does she care that any apology she could squeeze out of the Squelch would be insincere.

These tactics are an unfortunate route for Yvette to take. She and I both are women of strong convictions; though I may not always agree with her, I respect the fact that she is willing to fight to have her ideas expressed. We differ, however, in our choice of means of communication. Many of the official statements of DAAP, for example, offend me as a "non-racist white person," but I would never feel it was my right to stifle or condemn these statements; to repeat a popular if not over-used adage, this is America, and we can say what we want.

Though Yvette's attempt at coercion was unsuccessful (my Benjamin has convictions, after all), she has shown that she cares more about pushing a certain agenda than squelching (no pun intended) campus racism. I hope she and every ASUC official learns that, crass though we may be, the Squelch takes its rights very seriously, and we will not "negotiate" those rights away.



(0) comments

Friday, September 03, 2004

Something I can tell my grandkids.

I found out recently that William Hung lived/lives in the Nash Hotel on University between Shattuck and Milvia. The connection to Rebecca C. Brown? The landlords of the apartment I lived in my sophomore year own and operate said hotel! Old Billy Hung and I paid rent to the same husband/wife team. Small world.

On a side note, I'm fairly convinced that the Nash Hotel is a brothel.



(0) comments